Short answer: Leapsome prices by module in euros per employee per month (as of October 2026): Performance Reviews 7, Goals and OKRs 4, Engagement 4, plus a platform fee. Reviews and goals together are 11 euros before the platform fee, so 50 people pay from 550 euros a month. Harmny is free for up to 10 users, then $8/user/month on Starter ($400 a month for 50) or $16 on Growth ($800), and you can sign up without a sales call. Leapsome is the better pick if you need GDPR-native Berlin hosting.
Why do teams look for Leapsome alternatives?
Leapsome is a performance management platform with feature depth comparable to Lattice and GDPR-native compliance out of Berlin. But it prices modularly (a platform fee plus per-module costs for reviews, goals, engagement, and more), and discounts depend on module and headcount, so a firm number still means a sales conversation, even though a 14-day trial is available without one.
Teams looking for alternatives are usually either: (a) smaller than Leapsome's target market and unwilling to assemble a module-by-module quote for a 30-person org, or (b) evaluating Leapsome alongside competitors during procurement and want an honest comparison.
What do Leapsome and its alternatives cost?
Prices per user per month, list, as of October 2026, linked to each vendor's own page. Where a vendor hides its price we say custom quote.
| Tool | Price | Self-serve? | Key advantage vs Leapsome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harmny Top pick | $0 up to 10 users; $8 Starter; $16 Growth ($12.80 billed annually) | Yes | Self-serve, free tier, career frameworks, profitability tracking |
| Leapsome | In euros: Reviews 7, Goals and OKRs 4, Engagement 4, plus platform fee 7 (Pro 10). leapsome.com/pricing | Trial, then quote | GDPR-native, Berlin HQ; enterprise-grade depth |
| Lattice | $10 Performance, $8 Goals and OKRs, $4 Engagement per seat; $4,000/year minimum. lattice.com/pricing | No | More HRIS integrations; US-centric |
| 15Five | $4 / $11 / $16 per user by tier, billed annually. 15five.com/pricing | Yes | Self-serve; Best-Self Review methodology |
| Culture Amp | Custom quote, annual only | No | Engagement analytics and benchmark depth |
| Workleap | Standard from $4,999 USD billed annually plus $32 per manager a month; Pro from $11,999 USD. workleap.com/pricing | Yes | Much cheaper; lighter-weight |
| Teamflect | Free up to 10 users; then $9 Essential / $14 Professional monthly, or $7 / $11 billed annually. teamflect.com/pricing | Yes | Native Teams; free tier |
| Small Improvements | $3 Launch / $6 Grow / $9 Elevate per user a month, billed annually; 20-user minimum on Launch and Grow, 30 on Elevate. small-improvements.com/pricing | Yes | Simple UX; affordable |
Which are the best Leapsome alternatives?
1. Harmny, best self-serve Leapsome alternative
Best pickFor teams that want Leapsome's feature depth without assembling a module quote: Harmny covers reviews, goals, 1:1s, competency frameworks, career pathing, and engagement surveys in two paid tiers (Starter and Growth), self-serve, starting free. Harmny also runs per-project profitability tracking (cost rates derived from salary data, tiered visibility, client rollups) that Leapsome has no equivalent for, and an Org Brain AI assistant on the Growth plan that answers plain-language questions about the org. The main trade-off is compensation module maturity: Leapsome's has been in market longer. If GDPR-native, Berlin-headquartered infrastructure is a hard requirement, weigh that too.
Better than Leapsome on:
- ✓ No sales process required to start, free
- ✓ Two plan tiers instead of per-module billing
- ✓ Career pathing employees can self-serve
- ✓ Per-project profitability tracking (Leapsome has no equivalent)
- ✓ Org Brain AI: ask a question about the org, get an answer
- ✓ Client portal with approval gates, for agencies and consultancies
Leapsome wins on:
- • GDPR-native compliance out of a Berlin headquarters
- • External engagement benchmark data
- • Compensation module maturity
2. Lattice, best enterprise Leapsome alternative
Lattice is the most direct enterprise competitor to Leapsome, with comparable feature depth and stronger US-centric HRIS integrations (Workday, Rippling, BambooHR, ADP). Lattice also sells modularly: Performance at $10/seat/month, Goals and OKRs at $8 and Engagement at $4, with Compensation and Grow as add-ons, subject to a $4,000/year minimum commitment (as of October 2026, lattice.com/pricing). Lattice has a longer track record and more established compensation management. Choose Leapsome over Lattice for GDPR-native, EU-headquartered infrastructure; choose Lattice over Leapsome for deep US HRIS integration.
3. 15Five
Self-serve with a strong coaching methodology, now priced in three tiers from $4/user/month (engagement only) to $16/user/month (full platform). No sales process, and a 14-day free trial. Best for mid-market teams that want to start without procurement.
Best for: 50-500 teams
vs Leapsome: Self-serve, no contract negotiation; tiered by need
4. Culture Amp
An engagement analytics platform. If engagement measurement is your primary driver, Culture Amp has more benchmark data and survey methodology depth than Leapsome. Pricing is quote-based and annual-only, similar friction to Leapsome. Performance management is secondary.
Best for: 200+ orgs where engagement is primary
vs Leapsome: Better engagement analytics; similar enterprise friction
5. Workleap (Officevibe)
Lightweight pulse surveys and 1:1s, now sold as plans: Standard from $4,999 USD billed annually plus $32 per manager a month (workleap.com/pricing, as of October 2026). A good option if you want Leapsome's engagement measurement use case without the module-based cost of a full performance suite.
Best for: 25-500 teams
vs Leapsome: Cheaper; simpler; less review/goal depth
6-8. Teamflect / Small Improvements / PerformYard
Teamflect (free up to 10 users, then $7-14/user/month) for Microsoft Teams shops. Small Improvements ($3-9/user/month billed annually, 20-user minimum on the lower tiers) for teams that want clean UX at lower cost. PerformYard ($5-15 per person a month, billed annually) for complex custom review requirements. None match Leapsome in enterprise depth.
Best for: Niche fits (Teams, simple UX, custom reviews)
vs Leapsome: Cheaper and/or more specific; less enterprise-ready
What does Leapsome cost for 50 and 150 people?
Monthly cost at list price, as of October 2026, for reviews plus goals and OKRs. Leapsome is priced in euros (leapsome.com/pricing); Harmny in US dollars (harmny.ai/pricing). We do not convert currencies. Leapsome's page says the platform fee shows as 0 until 31 December 2026 if you buy a Talent Suite module by then; list is 7 for Foundation and 10 for Pro. Volume and multi-module discounts come from a quote and are not included.
| Option | 50 seats, per month | 150 seats, per month |
|---|---|---|
| Leapsome, launch promo platform fee (Reviews 7 + Goals 4) | 550 euros | 1,650 euros |
| Leapsome, Foundation list (adds 7) | 900 euros | 2,700 euros |
| Leapsome, Pro platform (adds 10) | 1,050 euros | 3,150 euros |
| Harmny Starter ($8, reviews and goals) | $400 | $1,200 |
| Harmny Growth ($16, adds company OKRs and 360 feedback) | $800 ($640 billed annually) | $2,400 ($1,920 billed annually) |
The honest read: on list prices Leapsome and Harmny Growth land in the same range once the platform fee applies, so price alone is not the reason to switch. Leapsome also bundles HRIS features in its platform fee, which Harmny covers differently. The reasons to switch are self-serve setup, a free tier for the first 10 users, and a smaller module list.
How hard is it to switch from Leapsome?
Expect a setup job rather than a data migration. This is what Harmny supports today.
What can move:
- People and reporting lines. Harmny's team import takes a CSV or Excel file (.csv, .xlsx, .xls), up to 500 rows per upload, with email (required), first and last name, role, department, manager email, start date and career ladder columns.
- Competency frameworks. Harmny can import a framework from an Excel file, with an example file to copy. See competency frameworks.
What does not move automatically:
- Review history and feedback. We found no review-history importer in Harmny. Export what Leapsome gives you and archive it (ask Leapsome which formats it offers).
- Active goals and OKRs. There is no goal file importer, so current objectives are re-entered by hand.
- HRIS data such as payroll connectors. Leapsome's Pro platform lists DATEV and payroll connectors; Harmny's custom HRIS integrations are an Enterprise-plan item, so check this before you leave.
When should you stay with Leapsome?
Leapsome's GDPR-native design and Berlin base are a genuine advantage for European companies that want a vendor built around EU data-protection norms from the start. The combination of that compliance posture, engagement analytics, and compensation management in one platform is hard to replicate at the same enterprise scale. If your legal team needs specific contractual data-residency terms, confirm the current details directly with Leapsome; don't assume a marketing claim is a binding SLA.
See also: Lattice alternatives, 15Five alternatives, Culture Amp alternatives, and Harmny vs Lattice.